About Me

Name: O
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Palin Experience

McCain's VP pick, Sarah Palin, has been quite interesting for several reasons. First, McCain did with timing of the Palin announcement precisely what Obama did not do with the Biden announcement -- he maximized media attention. Obama simply waited too long. Second, and in part what this post will focus on, is the response she's elicited from the left. Some are focusing on personal attacks; the DailyKos stands out in particular. They've gone after an angle so ridiculous and so beyond rationality as to potentially hurt themselves.

Others however, have attacked her experience. They say she hasn't had enough as governor of Alaska and more importantly, frame her lack of experience in terms of  Obama's experience; that is, they argue that Obama has more experience than she does. But the comparison is flawed on the most basic level -- the race is Obama vs. McCain, not Obama vs. Palin. To make a valid comparison, Biden clearly has more experience in Washington and in politics than does Palin, but is that a good thing? Whatever happened to change we can believe in? Democrats often counter that the VP candidates don't matter too much. So why then are they attacking Palin's experience in the first place?

The bottom line is that Palin is an excellent pick. Democrats know it. The swift efforts to discredit her are their best option to defeat her and are part of politics as usual -- clearly not the change the Obama ticket has draped over itself. Even more fundamental is the observation that the closed ideology fueling the left is built upon contradictions such as these. Their philosophy can only exist with contradictions and for that reason, it will ultimately fail.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama, It Is About Us

 The government should do that which we cannot do ourselves. So reasoned Obama tonight, amid throngs of tearful supporters, battle music, and a classical stage that would put even Zeus to shame. Yet Obama, unsurprisingly, misses the point. The United States is a government by the people, for the people. We are the government, we set our own policies. How can we do something we cannot do ourselves? Perhaps Obama truly means what he says; that we are no more our own government. Or perhaps this is the change that he's promised.

I could attack logic errors all night long and, while perhaps technically convincing, it really doesn't match the emotion Obama commands. As a mere mortal, I could never hope to destine myself to such eloquent heights, to think with the supernatural clarity that belongs only to him. But I will try, foolishly of course, to make one more simple point.

45 years ago today, Martin Luther King shared a dream with the nation, immensely profound and vastly influential. Tonight, Barack Obama had the same opportunity -- to share with the nation his unique yet universally appealing vision for the future. Instead, Obama saw fit to focus on petty politics; he focused on how McCain and Bush deceived the American Promise through failed and tired policy. With all that he's been given, all the attention, all the passes, how could he throw away a perfect media opportunity? Could it be that he is not what we are told he is? Could he be not just a mortal, but a strategically ignorant one?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kid Creates Veggie Stand, Government Stops Kid

Apparently not even children are immune to the regulatory disease. An 11-year-old's organic veggie stand was too much for some Clayton, CA residents. From ABC News:
Municipal officials have shut down the [veggie] stand, saying that it violates zoning rules that prohibit commercial activities in a residential area. It also violates health regulations that say food can't be sold without a permit.
Most people would consider this stand insignificant but, since it's technically part of the market, and because markets are bad, the no-tolerance regulations in Clayton are perfectly acceptable. It would seem that even though the produce was organic (remember, pesticides are also bad), the justice of regulation trumps nutritional benefits and just being a kid. Two "good" policies that conflict with another "good" policy are hardly good at all. This sort of market intervention is a self-contradictory dogma which inevitably leads to these conundrums.
 
But we're dealing with socialists, so it's really no surprise.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »